In Discussion: Trust as a Competitive Advantage for Media Organizations in the AI Era

Trust has always been central to media, but in the age of generative AI it has become a differentiator. In the first episode of AI on the Record, Jennifer Woodard spoke with Richard Lander, Director at Citywire, a wealth intelligence company, about what makes credibility hard to copy and why it still matters in an era where AI systems remix content at scale.

Large language models blend content from multiple sources and serve it back as a single answer. Lander uses a food analogy to describe the difference: Citywire’s journalism is the steak, while the mix you get from a generalist model is hamburger. Readers may find both filling, but only one carries the certainty of origin. For an industry as precise as global wealth management, that distinction matters.

Citywire has invested in authority for more than two decades. It employs 60 to 70 journalists worldwide, reporting on wealth management with depth and consistency. Its audience is not anonymous. Registration walls mean readers must identify themselves – what role they hold, who they work for, and the size of assets they manage. That visibility builds confidence that Citywire knows both its readers and its sector. Over time, this steady investment compounds into credibility that competitors cannot easily replicate.

The commercial outcomes for the media company are clear. Advertisers and asset managers pay a premium to reach Citywire’s readers because they know exactly who they are speaking to. Longer sessions and higher return rates show that content is trusted. Events add another layer, bringing advisers and asset managers together in settings that reinforce confidence and extend relationships. The combination of content, verified audience, and community creates value beyond pageviews.

This is not confined to the media. Any organization with unique expertise and a defined audience can take a similar approach. Lander noted that archives of recipes, wine vintages, or technical manuals could form the basis of specialised AI models. The key is to treat owned content as an asset rather than a free contribution to external platforms.

Citywire’s experience also shows that trust is strengthened by careful choices in technology partnerships. Their collaboration with Miso demonstrates how a smaller, focused provider can help build proprietary AI tools that serve readers without diluting brand value. The risk lies less in AI itself and more in who you choose to work with.

For Logically, these lessons are directly relevant. Our work in narrative intelligence also depends on source quality, niche expertise, and long-term credibility. When organizations use our platform to monitor threats, protect trust, or anticipate risks, they rely on the assurance that the intelligence comes from unbiased, transparent, high-signal sources. As with Citywire, that trust compounds into outcomes: stronger resilience, better decisions, and more confident stakeholders.

The future will continue to test how organizations defend and demonstrate credibility. Platforms change, AI evolves, and traffic sources fluctuate. What remains durable is the investment in expertise, the cultivation of verified audiences, and the clear translation of trust into commercial and strategic results. As Lander observed, rivals and AI systems can copy the words, but they cannot copy the relationships and reputation built over decades.

Examine where your trust shows up; your reporting, your intelligence, and your customer relationships. In an environment shaped by AI, trust is not only protection; it is an asset that grows in value over time.

Listen (or watch!) to the full episode of AI on the Record on your favourite platform:

In Discussion: Trust as a Competitive Advantage for Media Organizations in the AI Era

Subscribe to the Logically Newsletter